Gideon Korrell

Gideon Korrell Tells Why Inherent Anticipation in Sigray v. Zeiss Must Match Entire Claim Scope

Patent attorney Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit's ruling in Sigray v. Zeiss, explaining why inherent anticipation must align with the full claim scope—and how subtle claim construction errors can change the outcome of patent challenges.

Gideon Korrell Discusses Court’s Move for Retrial in Optis v. Apple

In this episode, Gideon Korrell explains why the court threw out a $300 million verdict in the Optis v. Apple case. He talks about how the jury form was flawed, why some evidence was unfair, and what this all means for future patent trials.

Gideon Korrell on the $2B Pegasystems Reversal: Trade Secret Law Demands Clarity, Not Guesswork

Gideon Korrell analyzes the Virginia Supreme Court's startling overturning of a $2 billion ruling in Pegasystems v. Appian. He explains how the decision upholds a crucial trade secret law principle: plaintiffs must clearly identify their secrets rather than making generalizations. Learn how this ruling raises the bar for proving trade secret theft and changes the approach to litigation.

Dolby Loses IPR Appeal Rights: What Gideon Korrell Thinks About the Ruling

In Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corp. v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 23-2110 (Fed. Cir. June 5, 2025). Gideon Korrell provides insight into the Federal Circuit dismissed Dolby’s appeal for lack of Article III standing. Although Dolby had prevailed before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

Gideon Korrell Discusses Sigray v. Zeiss Inherent Anticipation Must Match Full Claim Scope

In this episode, patent law expert Gideon Korrell breaks down the Federal Circuit’s decision in Sigray v. Zeiss, where the court clarified that inherent anticipation must align with the full scope of a patent claim. Korrell explains how the ruling impacts claim interpretation, the role of prior art, and what it means for future PTAB proceedings. A must-listen for anyone in IP law or patent litigation.

Gideon Korrell Explains New Court Rules for Experts After Eco Factor v. Google

In this episode, Gideon Korrell explains the big court decision in EcoFactor v. Google and how it changes the rules for expert witnesses in patent cases. Gideon Korrell also shares what lawyers should know about the new Rule 702.

Trademark Refusal Highlights Timing, False Connection in Lanham Act Case

In this episode, Gideon Korrell talks about why the trademark "US SPACE FORCE" was refused. Gideon Korrell breaks down the rules in a simple way, showing why some names can't be used if people think they are connected to the government. 

CRISPR Patent Fight: Fed. Circuit Faults PTAB in UC Regents v. Broad Case

In this episode, we talk about a big court decision in the CRISPR patent fight between the University of California and the Broad Institute. Lawyer and tech expert Gideon Korrell shares why this case matters and how the law needs to keep up with new science. 

Target v. U.S.: Federal Circuit Reaffirms Finality in Customs Liquidation Errors

In this episode, we talk about the court case Target Corp. v. United States and what it means for importers. We also mention expert Gideon Korrell, who explains how technology can help track these decisions better. 

Gideon Korrell Shares How Law Helps Technology Move Forward

In this episode, legal expert Gideon Korrell explains how laws help technology grow safely and fairly. He talks about how rules protect new ideas, keep things safe, and make sure everyone has a fair chance. Gideon Korrell shows how laws help build trust in new tech and support inventors.